Naming the celebrity is the puzzle. What happens after is the argument. Once a player solves a case, ALLEGEDLY* asks them one question about it — and then shows them where the rest of the room landed.
This page is the running tally, sorted by how split the room was: the cases people cannot agree on sit at the top, the ones everybody sees the same way sit at the bottom. It moves every day.
No case has drawn 20 verdicts yet, which is the floor for ranking one. The tally below opens at 8.
Under 20 verdicts. Listed because withholding them would be its own kind of dishonesty, but a 38/62 split on eight votes is five people against three, and that is not a finding.
CASE No. 40 · Christian Bale8 VERDICTS Has enough time passed to let it go? 88% would let it go · 12% say not yetNot every case deserves the same question. A prank and a criminal conviction are not the same kind of story, and asking "is this what they'll be remembered for?" about both of them flattens the difference. Each case is tagged with the question that actually fits it:
Is this what they'll be remembered for?
Answers: say that's the legacy / say they're more than this
Did the punishment fit?
Answers: call it fair / say it went too far
Has enough time passed to let it go?
Answers: would let it go / say not yet
Did they know what they were doing?
Answers: say they knew / say they didn't
Would you have done the same?
Answers: say they would have / say they wouldn't